Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Railroad Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1936No. L. A. 14451PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

By this proceeding the petitioner seeks to annul the -decision and order of the Railroad Commission purporting to fix the just compensation to be paid by the City of Tulare for certain lands, properties and rights of the petitioner, constituting the electrical distributing system of the petitioner within that city.

The jurisdiction of the commission to make a decision such as the one here complained of is conferred by article XII, section 23a, of the California Constitution, which reads as follows: 1 ‘ The railroad commission shall have and exercise such power and jurisdiction as shall be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1943

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API