Beazley v. Embree
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Defendant Wilson appeals from a judgment entered in this action against him; and also from an order made prior to judgment denying his application for a change of place of trial from the county of Orange to the county of Los Angeles.
This action was brought to recover the sum of one thousand dollars and certain interest money alleged to be due from the defendants on account of conditions stated in a certain contract for the sale of realty. The real property was located in the county of Los Angeles. Plaintiff alleged that in 1911, as vendor, he made a contract for the sale of the real estate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lisenby v. NewtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Brimmer v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Bimrose v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Robinson v. RispinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Fruitvale Canning Co. v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Wilson v. BeazleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- The Armstrong Co. v. Shell Co. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Tarpey v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.