Robinson v. Rispin
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. William D. Dehy, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On November 10, 1910, plaintiff and defendant Rispin entered into a written agreement for the drilling of certain oil wells in Kern County. Robinson agreed to furnish the tools and labor and drill two or more wells for which Rispin agreed to pay him $4.50 for each vertical foot drilled. Rispin was “to furnish all necessary fuel, water, tubing and casing at the well being drilled,” and Robinson agreed to do the work according to certain specifications “in a thoroughly workmanlike manner under the instructions of said Rispin,” and it was further provided that Robinson should not be compelled to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Weidner v. ZieglarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Fruitvale Canning Co. v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Morello v. Growers Grape Products Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.