McKenzie v. Barling
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County denying a motion for change of place of trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, J.—
This is an appeal by some of the defendants from an order of the superior court denying their motion for a change of the place of trial.
The action was brought against the defendants, Bar-*460ling, Cohen, W. F. Beck, and Alfred Beck, to recover a money judgment. The complaint avers that the defendants were partners in the business of receiving raisins, preparing them for market, and selling them— the profits to be divided with those furnishing the raisins in the raw state; that plaintiffs furnished them certain raisins which defendants prepared and sold for a certain amount of money;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McSherry v. Pennsylvania Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Remington Sewing Machine Co. v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- O'Neil v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Eddy v. HoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Sourbis v. RhoadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.