Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Beazley

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1921No. L. A. No. 5920PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Plaintiff and cross-defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him upon botli complaint and cross-complaint. The contract out of which the present action arose was an agreement for the sale of real property executed December 1, 1911, by defendant Beazley, as owner, and O. H. and Rachel M. Embree as purchasers. By the terms of this contract the vendees agreed to pay the sum of eight thousand dollars in one thousand dollar annual installments, with interest on deferred payments payable annually on the first of December, and to pay all taxes and assessments that might thereafter become…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lisenby v. NewtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Latimer v. Capay Valley Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Robinson v. RispinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Ferguson v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Fruitvale Canning Co. v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Shutes v. CheneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Chatham Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Angier Chemical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API