Tarpey v. Curran
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.
This is an action to recover 133,617.20, balance due on a last installment of $37,500 under agreement to purchase certain magnesite mining claims, to which plaintiff as vendor and defendants Curran and Phillips as vendees were the original parties, and for the foreclosure of a vendor’s lien on said mining claims.
Defendants Thomas, Winter, Piedra Magnesite Company and American Refractories Company are joined as claimants of interests in the mining property and a calcining plant, as purchasers, grantees, assignees, mortgagees and judgment creditors.
The third amended complaint alleges that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lisenby v. NewtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Robinson v. RispinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Wilson v. BeazleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Fruitvale Canning Co. v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- The Armstrong Co. v. Shell Co. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Lonas v. Metropolitan Mortgage and Securities Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.