Brimmer v. Salisbury
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County. Franklin J. Cole, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This appeal is from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone. Plaintiff brought his action to enforce the collection of a promissory note in the sum of five hundred dollars executed by defendants. Defendants answered, alleging lack of consideration and fraud in the procurement of the instrument. The facts in this regard alleged and found by the court are the following: In 1908 defendants entered into an agreement with the plaintiff to purchase a piece of land owned by plaintiff in Imperial County for- the sum of six thousand two hundred and fifty dollars, two thousand five hundred dollars of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Burwell v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- President of Harvard College v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Joyce v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Anderson v. WillsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Seeburg v. El Royale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Suburban Improvement Co. v. Scott Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Allen v. ChatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.