Legal Opinion
Baright v. Willis
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1984No. Civ. 68461PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
Introduction
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining without leave to amend a general demurrer to his second amended complaint. The sole question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff’s legal malpractice action against respondent is barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.6). We conclude it is a question of fact and reverse the judgment of dismissal.
Statement of Facts
Plaintiff’s second amended complaint discloses the following express and reasonably inferred facts: Plaintiff, Rick Baright, retained respondent,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- San Francisco Unified School District v. W.R. Grace & Company-ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Pulver v. Avco Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Wilshire Westwood Associates v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Radovich v. Locke-PaddonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- ABA Recovery Services, Inc. v. KonoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.