Legal Opinion

Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1971No. L.A. 29865PublishedCited by 335 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

6 Cal.3d 176 (1971)

491 P.2d 421

98 Cal. Rptr. 837

GERALD F. NEEL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

MAGANA, OLNEY, LEVY, CATHCART & GELFAND et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. L.A. 29865.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 2, 1971.

COUNSEL

Wagner & Scuderi and Robert S. Scuderi for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jack Tenner and William B. Murrish for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

In this suit for legal malpractice plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment against them grounded upon the two-year statute of limitations of Code of Civil Procedure section 339. That…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by335 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013

330 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API