Legal Opinion
ABA Recovery Services, Inc. v. Konold
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1988No. D005462PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHERER, J. *
Plaintiff ABA Recovery Services, Inc. (ABA) appeals a summary judgment favoring defendants J. Tim Konold, the law firm of Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, David Loadman and the law firm of Larabee & Loadman on ABA’s complaint for attorney malpractice.
Factual and Procedural Background
ABA is an automobile repossession and towing business. In 1984, ABA unsuccessfully applied to the City of San Diego (City) for a police department towing contract. ABA retained the law firm of Higgs, Fletcher & Mack and J. Tim Konold (collectively Konold) to file an administrative claim with the City on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Johnson v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Traub Co. v. Coffee Break Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Reed v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Secretarial Service, Inc. v. FroehlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- California Aviation, Inc. v. LeedsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Ellwanger v. Budsberg (In Re Ellwanger)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1992
- American Alternative Energy Partners II v. Windridge, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Bourhis v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.