Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. South Hoover Hospital

California Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1976No. L.A. 30589PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

We. consider the application of the statute of limitations in medical malpractice actions and, particularly, construe section 340.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure as it read prior to September 24, 1975. That section then provided that the limitations period for actions founded in medical malpractice was “four years after the date of injury or one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury, whichever first occurs.” The section further recited that “[t]his time limitation shall be tolled for any period…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Nunez v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API