Legal Opinion

Brown v. Bleiberg

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1982No. L.A. 31531PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

We interpret provisions of the statute of limitation dealing with medical malpractice. In the case at bench, we reverse a summary judgment in favor of a podiatrist and a physician despite the passage of over 12 years since the plaintiff’s injury. Although the delay in this case was extreme, a triable issue of fact exists whether the doctors’ alleged affirmative concealment of the true nature of the surgery prevented plaintiff from discovering that the injury resulted from the defendants’ tortious conduct in performing an unnecessary operation. We cannot say as a matter of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API