Brown v. Bleiberg
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
We interpret provisions of the statute of limitation dealing with medical malpractice. In the case at bench, we reverse a summary judgment in favor of a podiatrist and a physician despite the passage of over 12 years since the plaintiff’s injury. Although the delay in this case was extreme, a triable issue of fact exists whether the doctors’ alleged affirmative concealment of the true nature of the surgery prevented plaintiff from discovering that the injury resulted from the defendants’ tortious conduct in performing an unnecessary operation. We cannot say as a matter of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.