Legal Opinion

Tanney v. Boles

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 1, 2005No. 04-71260PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERTS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 44)and Defendant Boles’ Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 45). Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Plaintiff is allowed to amend his complaint to clarify the capacities under which Defendant is sued and the forms of relief requested.

II. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Gene Tanney is currently an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Cox v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Leavitt v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  3. Diaz v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Velzen v. Grand Valley State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
  5. ALAN PATRICK HALL v. LOWELL GRIFFINDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API