Legal Opinion
Lardie v. Birkett
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 20, 2002No. CIV.01-40339PublishedCited by 234 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
GADOLA, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [docket entry 1], Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgement [docket entry 10], and the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Paul J. Komives, United States Magistrate Judge [docket entry 31].
The Report and Recommendation recommended that this Court grant Respondent’s Motion and dismiss the Petition because it is barred under the one-year statute of limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Thomas Lucidore v. New York State Division of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Holloway v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Whalen v. RandleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Lyons v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Redmond v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Cameron v. BirkettDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Chancellor v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.