Legal Opinion

Gottschalk v. City & County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 12, 2013No. C-12-4531 EMCPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FOR SANCTIONS

(Docket Nos. 57, 63, 65, 67, 72, 100)

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff in this matter brings suit against á variety of defendants alleging various causes of action that appear to largely stem from her unsuccessful application for employment with the San Francisco Human Rights Commission. This Court previously granted Defendant City and County of San Francisco’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs first amended complaint for failure to conform to the requirements…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Awasthi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  2. Awasthi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Boone v. Phoenix, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. Bryant v. RhodesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024
  5. Business Loan Center, LLC v. M/V Cape FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API