Legal Opinion
ATA Defense Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 27, 1997No. 97-382CPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this post-award bid protest action, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b), plaintiff, ATA Defense Industries, Inc. (ATA), seeks an injunction ordering the Department of the Army to suspend performance of and to terminate a purchase order contract awarded to Caswell International, Inc. (Caswell), on May 13,1997. Pursuant to the requests of the parties, this case was handled on an expedited basis. Plaintiff filed its complaint on May 30, 1997, and on June 24, 1997, after the parties conducted discovery, this court held a trial on the merits. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Three S Consulting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Filtration Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.