Legal Opinion

Camp v. Pitts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 26, 1973No. 72-864PublishedCited by 2,290 opinions

1Per curiam

In its present posture this case presents a narrow, but substantial, question with respect to the proper procedure to be followed when a reviewing court determines that an administrative agency’s stated justification for informal action does not provide an adequate basis for judicial review.

In 1967, respondents submitted an application to the Comptroller of the Currency for a certificate authorizing them to organize a new bank in Hartsville, South Carolina. See 12 U. S. C. §27; 12 CFR §4.2 (1972). On the basis of information received from a national bank examiner and from various interested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. F. W. Pitts v. William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  5. Pitts v. CampDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by2,290 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  5. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

2,285 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API