Legal Opinion
Filtration Development Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 13, 2004No. 03-2835CPublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
FUTEY, Judge.
This post-award bid protest case is before the court on the parties’ corresponding cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record, as well as plaintiffs request for a permanent injunction. Difficult questions pertaining to balancing the level of deference that should be afforded to military decisions with the enforcement of statutory and regulatory procurement laws are addressed herein. In this regard, the parties have raised numerous persuasive and thought provoking arguments which can be categorized into three predominate sections. First, the parties…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Pai Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Reilly's Wholesale Produce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Arinc Engineering Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.