United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action is before the court on plaintiffs motion for a permanent injunction and defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff maintains that, because its proposal was “substantially equal” to the proposal of the contractor ultimately awarded the contract, and plaintiff was the lowest priced offeror, it should have received the subject contract. Plaintiff further asserts that numerous irregularities in the procurement process violated applicable laws and regulations, and were ultimately prejudicial to plaintiff.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Seattle Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Filtration Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.