Legal Opinion
Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 3, 1999No. 99-144CPublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
Plaintiff, Cubic Defense Systems (Cubic), has brought this post-award bid protest pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (West 1998), challenging several aspects of the competition and subsequent award by the United States Air Force (Air Force) to intervenor, Metric Systems Corporation (Metric), of a procurement for a pilot training system for United States Air Force, Europe (USAFE). Cubic’s amended complaint and its motion for summary judgment and permanent injunction allege five bases *453for relief. The Court finds each of these without merit and, accordingly,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Fort Carson Support Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Information Sciences Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.