Legal Opinion
O'Neal v. Ferguson Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2001No. 99-2037PublishedCited by 323 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Henry B. O’Neal was terminated from his job one day after his attorney sent a letter to his employer, Ferguson Construction Company (“Ferguson”), accusing the company of reassigning O’Neal in retaliation for his filing race discrimination and retaliation claims with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). O’Neal filed suit against Ferguson under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) (“Title VII”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging hostile work environment and retaliation. The jury found for O’Neal on his retaliation claim but not on his hostile work…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Morgan v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by323 opinions
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Cox v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Duncan v. Manager, Department of SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
318 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.