Legal Opinion
Clark County School District v. Breeden
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 23, 2001No. 00-866PublishedCited by 3,278 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 255, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §2000e-3(a), it is unlawful “for an employer to discriminate against any of his employees . . . because [the employee] has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by [Title VII], or because [the employee] has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under [Title VII].” In 1997, respondent filed a §2000e-3(a) retaliation claim against petitioner Clark County School District. The claim as eventually amended…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,278 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
3,273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.