Legal Opinion

Cox v. Glanz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2015No. 14-5022PublishedCited by 320 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

After Charles Jernegan committed suicide at the David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma (“Jail”), his mother, Plaintiff-Appellee Carolyn Cox, commenced this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Defendant-Appellant Stanley Glanz, the Tulsa County Sheriff (“Sheriff Glanz” or “the Sheriff’). Ms. Cox sought to hold Sheriff Glanz liable for Mr. Jernegan’s suicide in his individual capacity (relying upon a supervisory-liability theory) and in his official capacity. Regarding both capacities, she alleged Eighth Amendment violations. Sheriff Glanz moved for summary…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by320 opinions

  1. Patrick Booker v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  5. Cummings v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

315 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API