Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tilson, Judge:
Certain screws, assessed with, duty at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “articles or wares not specially provided for, if composed wholly or in chief value of * * * brass * * are claimed to be properly dutiable at but 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 338 of said act as “screws, commonly called wood screws, of iron or steel.”
At the hearing, counsel for the importer made this preliminary statement:
* * ' * we also rely on the claim in the printed portion of the protest, which states:
If said merchandise…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Strauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Arthur v. SussfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Sheffler Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947