Legal Opinion

Vantine v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 20, 1913No. 964PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7371 (T. D. 32582).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The issue in this case is whether certain screens of varying height, consisting of frameworks of wood with embroidered silk panels, are dutiable as assessed by the collector under paragraph 402 or as claimed by the importers under paragraph 214 of the tariff act of 1909.

The two paragraphs in question read as follows:

402. Laces, edgings, insertings, galloons, flouncings, neck rufflings, ruchings, braids, fringes, trimmings, ornaments, nets or nettings, veils or veilings, and articles made wholly or in part of any of the foregoing, or of chiffons, embroideries and articles embroidered by hand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arthur's Executors v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Drew v. GrinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. Linen Thread Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Kobata v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Louisville Bedding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API