Legal Opinion

Arthur's Executors v. Butterfield

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 19, 1888No. 167PublishedCited by 59 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was an action at law to recover customs duties alleged to have been illegally exacted. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant sued out this writ of error. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field

This action was brought by the plaintiffs below to recover of the late collector of the port of New York certain sums of money alleged to have been illegally exacted as duties on goods imported by them. It. was tried in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, where the plaintiffs recovered a verdict, and to review the judgment entered thereon the executors of the collector, since deceased, have sued out this writ of error.

' The complaint describes the goods imported in general terms as manufactures of hair. There were fourteen importations between' the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Smythe v. FiskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. 200 Chests of TeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Arthur v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Arthur v. SussfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API