Volvo Penta of the Americas, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PRINCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this discovery dispute, the plaintiff, Volvo Penta of the Americas, Inc., has agreed to deliver confidential marketing and business plan information to defendant Brunswick Corporation’s retained counsel. The parties also agree that a protective order should ensure that personnel from Brunswick, one of Volvo Penta’s “hostile” competitors, cannot review this information. Volvo Penta, however, further wishes to restrict Roya Behnia, Esq., a member of Brunswick’s in-house counsel, from having access to this information. For reasons discussed below,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In re Westinghouse Electric Corp. Uranium Contracts LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Amgen, Inc. v. Elanex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Autotech Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. Automationdirect.Com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- ODS Technologies, L.P. v. Magna Entertainment Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008