Legal Opinion
Autotech Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. Automationdirect.Com, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 21, 2006No. 05 C 5488PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
BACKGROUND
On January 18, 2006, Automationdirect.com (“ADC”) moved for a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c) regarding discovery of the names of customers and contacted prospective customers (and related information) who have been sold or solicited to purchase products ADC has received from Auto-tech Technologies L.P. (“Autotech”).1 The parties briefed the matter, taking diametrically opposed positions: ADC insisted that its customer names and related information were not discoverable under any circumstances, and that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Meridian Security Insurance Co. v. David L. SadowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Global Material Technologies, Inc. v. Dazheng Metal Fibre Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Federal Trade Commission v. Advocate Health Care NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Pfizer Inc. v. Apotex Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Silversun Indus., Inc. v. PPG Indus., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Braun Corp. v. Vantage Mobility International LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.