Legal Opinion

U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 23, 1984No. Appeal 84-639PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Interlocutory appeal on a certified question arising from a decision of the Court of International Trade (CIT)1 denying U.S. Steel’s (USS) corporate in-house counsel access to confidential information. We vacate and return.

Background

In Republic Steel Corp., supra, note 1, an action involving a negative preliminary injury determination by the International Trade Commission (ITC), the CIT denied a motion for access by USS’ in-house counsel to certain confidential information while granting access to counsel retained by other parties. Relying on an earlier decision in U.S.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Va. Dep't of Corr. v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. MGP Ingredients, Inc. v. Mars, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  5. Intel Corp. v. Via Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2000

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API