Legal Opinion
ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided November 3, 2010No. Action No. 2:10cv248PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
F. BRADFORD STILLMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On October 6, 2010, defendants Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Virginia Inc., and Verizon South Inc. (collectively, “Verizon”) filed an Expedited Motion for Entry of Protective Order (ECF No. 52) and supporting brief (ECF No. 53). The plaintiff, ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. (“ActiveVideo”) filed its opposition (ECF No. 84) and a supporting declaration (ECF No. 85) on October 20, 2010. Verizon filed a reply brief (ECF No. 91) on October 21, 2010.
I. BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement case, in which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Amgen, Inc. v. Elanex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Pfizer Inc. v. Apotex Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Philips v. Iguzzini Lighting USA, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. AT & T Mobility LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
- Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. EMC Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.