Legal Opinion
Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 2007No. Civil Action No. 06-658 (HHK/JMF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me for resolution of Declaratory Judgment Defendants’ Motion for Entry of a Protective Order (# 34). I will grant the motion in part in requiring a protective order that does not preclude in-house counsel for Merial Limited and Merial SAS (collectively, “Merial”) from accessing all materials in discovery. I will also require an additional penalty provision to be included in the protective order, and I will order Defendants to submit a revised protective order to the Court that is consistent with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Intel Corp. v. Via Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Glaxo Inc. v. Genpharm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Volvo Penta of the Americas, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Layne Christensen Co. v. Purolite Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- MGP Ingredients, Inc. v. Mars, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- D'Onofrio v. SFX Sports Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- D'Onofrio v. Sfx Sports Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Fairhaven Health LLC v. BioOrigyn LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.