Legal Opinion
In re Westinghouse Electric Corp. Uranium Contracts Litigation
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 19, 1977No. Misc. No. 6728PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
SNYDER, District Judge.
This Court has been asked by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) to order compliance by Gulf Oil Corporation (Gulf) and Charles A. Boyce, its Secretary, with a notice of deposition and subpoena duces tecum which included “Schedules of Requested Documents” to be produced for examination and copying at Gulf’s Headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, within the jurisdiction of this Court. On the day before compliance was due, Gulf formally objected for a multiplicity of reasons, including attorney-client privilege, to either the copying of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. KaplanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Estate of KofskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.