Legal Opinion

Denny v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1987No. B026166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (Thaxton), J.

Petition to compel arbitration. Petitioner Pamela A. Denny sought arbitration of a controversy concerning the coverage provided by the uninsured motorist portion of her automobile insurance policy. Named as defendants were St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co., the St. Paul Property and Liability Insurance Co., and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. (hereinafter St. Paul).

The trial court denied the petition on the ground that the vehicle petitioner was driving at the time she sustained serious personal injuries was not an uninsured motor vehicle within the meaning of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CockingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HanselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. California Cas. Indem. Exch. v. HoskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Thomas v. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Mercury Insurance v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Mercury Insurance v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API