Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Hansel

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1970No. Civ. 36341PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment declaring that the uninsured motorist clause in an automobile liability policy issued by respondent is inapplicable to an injury suffered by appellant. We affirm the judgment.

Facts

The parties agree on the pertinent facts. Respondent issued its policy of automobile liability insurance to appellant. The policy included uninsured motorist coverage as provided in Insurance Code section 11580.2. While the policy was in force, appellant observed Johnny Stevens driving a vehicle which appeared to be equipped with “mag wheels” which had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herzog v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Atlantic National Insurance v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mission Insurance v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Vice v. Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Acceptance Insurance v. Syufy EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Waite v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. American National Property & Casualty Co. v. Julie R.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. MacIasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API