Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Cocking

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1981No. L. A. 31340PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

We resolve a constitutional challenge to section 11580.1, subdivision (c), of the Insurance Code (further statutory references are to that code unless otherwise indicated) which authorizes automobile liability insurers to exclude from coverage an insured’s bodily injury liability to any other person insured under the policy. As will appear, we conclude that the provision is valid.

Defendant Cecilia Glorious, wife of defendant Paul Cocking, was injured while she was a passenger in a car driven by him. She sued him for damages alleging that her injuries were caused by her…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Newland v. Board of GovernorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Estep v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API