Legal Opinion

California Cas. Indem. Exch. v. Hoskin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1978No. Civ. 3273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NAIRN, J. *

This is a case of first impression in the State of California.

The California Casualty Indemnity Exchange (hereinafter respondent) sued for a declaration that Carol Hoskin (appellant) was not afforded liability coverage or uninsured motorist protection under her automobile insurance policy with respondent with respect to an accident occurring on March 22, 1973. The matter was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts, and thereafter the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of respondent and judgment was entered. We affirm.

The agreed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Mission Insurance v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. WarwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Schwalbe v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Colonial InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CockingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Thomas v. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. First National Insurance Co. of America v. PeralaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Denny v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API