Legal Opinion

Thomas v. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1994No. 77156PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether exclusionary provisions in a California liability policy, which leave an injured passenger without any coverage, are contrary to the legislative policy in Oklahoma’s compulsory liability insurance law? We answer in the affirmative and hold that, on the record in this case, the clauses are nugatory against the passenger’s claim for protection under the minimum statutory liability coverage.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

Homer Thomas, plaintiff-appellant [Thomas], was injured on July 16, 1985 in a one-car accident while a passenger in a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spring Valley Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WendtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Bohannan v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. May v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API