Legal Opinion
Mercury Insurance v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 24, 2000No. B120256PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*44Opinion
WOODS, J.
Plaintiff Mercury Insurance Company (Mercury) appeals from judgments entered after the court granted summary judgments in favor of defendants Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles (Enterprise) and California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA). Plaintiff sought to recover payment from defendants of the uninsured motorist (UM) bodily injury benefits it had paid to its insured. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Synopsis
I. Underlying Action
Mercury is an insurance carrier which offers and sells to members of the general public automobile liability insurance policies which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Home Ins. Co. v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- New Hampshire Indem v. Budget Rent-A-CarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- New Hampshire Indemnity Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- California Capital Insurance v. NielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Merchants Ins. Group v. Mitsubishi Motor Credit AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.