Legal Opinion
Cincotta v. Catania
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1923No. Civ. No. 4384PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff was awarded a judgment by the trial court in the sum of $1,015.45, and the defendant appealed under section. 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff’s complaint is in form a common count for money had and received. The defend ant filed an answer in which he denied the material allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint and in addition thereto he presented a cross-complaint. In view of the conclusions which we have reached regarding the cause of action pleaded by the plaintiff, it will not be necessary for us to consider the questions presented regarding the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Barrere v. SompsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. E. Clemens Horst Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- West v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Bodine v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Everhardy v. Union Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cincotta v. CataniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Arkelian v. National Bank of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.