Pabst Brewing Co. v. E. Clemens Horst Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; William C. Van Fleet, Judge. Action by the E. Clemens Horst Company against the Pabst Brewing Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, District Judge.
This was an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the sale of hops. The E. Clemens Horst Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New Jersey, and for a number of years last past has been extensively engaged in the business of growing, buying, and selling hops. The Pabst Brewing Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Wisconsin, and is engaged in the manufacture of beer. For convenience of reference the parties will be hereafter referred to as the Horst Company and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cherry Valley Iron Works v. Florence Iron River Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clyde Allen v. W. H. O. Alfalfa Milling Co., a Colorado Corporation, Harry Spayd v. W. H. O. Alfalfa Milling Co., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Shreve v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Griffin Grocery Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Geo. A. Moore & Co. v. MathieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. E. Clemens Horst Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.