Legal Opinion

Cincotta v. Catania

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1928No. Docket No. 6112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is the second appeal in this controversy. (Cincotta v. Catania, 61 Cal. App. 38 [214 Pac. 451].) The plaintiff inserted in his complaint two causes of action, (1) a common count for money had and received and (2) a common count for money paid. The defendant appeared and answered. He denied the material allegations set forth in plaintiff’s complaint and then he set forth an oral contract made on the eighteenth day of October, 1920. The provisions of that contract were that the plaintiff agreed to buy and the defendant agreed to sell and deliver to the plaintiff f. o. b. cars, ten tons of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cincotta v. CataniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. O'Dell v. O'DellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. McCreary v. Mercury Lumber DistributorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Tucker v. SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Post v. Palpar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API