McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff engaged himself to build for defendant a tunnel “in a good, substantial, and workmanlike manner to completion,” as far as the defendant might direct; “it being the intention to construct the said tunnel for the distance, of about 1,200 feet to the artesian wells, unless water in sufficient quantities is encountered before reaching that point.” It was stipulated “that said tunnel shall be constructed on the grades and according to the specifications of the engineers of the party of the second part in charge of the work. The tunnel will be timbered in a thoroughly workmanlike and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Fountain v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Martin v. DeetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cox v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by71 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.