Legal Opinion

Arkelian v. National Bank of Visalia

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1930No. Docket No. 90PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

In this action appellants brought suit against respondents for $500 alleged to have been had and received by respondents for the use of appellants. Judgment was rendered in favor of the respondents and this appeal was taken upon the ground that the findings of the trial court do not support the judgment, and, that upon the findings, judgment should have been rendered for appellants, if not for the full amount claimed, then at least, for the sum of $250.

The evidence shows that appellants were copartners engaged in the business of buying dried fruits; that the National Bank of Visalia was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lenchner v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Simms v. BoveeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API