Legal Opinion

Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. Marks

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1921No. L. A. No. 6462PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an action for five hundred dollars alleged to have been had and received by defendants for the use of plaintiff. Judgment went for defendants, and plaintiff appeals upon the judgment-roll alone. The claim is that the findings of the trial court do not support the judgment, and that Upon such findings judgment should have been given for the plaintiff.

As to the defendant D. 0. Marks, referred to in the answer as the president of defendant corporation, it is clear that the findings fully support the judgment in his favor.

As to plaintiff and defendant corporation, the findings are, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Sanders v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Ketchum & Sweet v. EvertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Oursler v. ThacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Guerrieri v. SeveriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Everhardy v. Union Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Lenchner v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API