Legal Opinion

California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1926No. Docket No. 2935PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The object of this action is to recover on a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant to the Virden Packing Company for the sum of $750. The note was dated November 7, 1920. Prior to the commencement of the action and after it had matured or become payable the note was assigned by the payee therein named to the plaintiff. These facts and the fact that no part of said note has been paid and the further fact of the refusal of defendant to pay the note upon its maturity are alleged in the complaint, and the prayer is for judgment in accord with the claim of plaintiff as to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. California Credit & Collection Co. v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Filet Menu, Inc. v. C.C.L. & G. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Wood v. Jotham Bixby Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. McClory v. DodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API