Toby v. Oregon Pacific Railroad
California Supreme Court
Separate appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
There are two separate appeals in this cause by the defendants, one from the final judgment, and the other *492from an order denying a motion for a new trial. As they depend to some extent upon the same statement they will be considered together.
The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage upon the steamer Eastern Oregon, executed at the city of New York, by the Oregon Pacific Eailroad Company, a corporation, on the tenth day of February, 1887, to the Florida Steamship Company, to secure the sum of $115,000, with interest at six per cent per annum, evidenced by twelve promissory notes…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Goodnow v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Wetmore v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Brown v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.