Legal Opinion

Wood v. Jotham Bixby Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1938No. Civ. 11882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs after trial before the court without a jury in an action to rescind a contract of purchase of real property defendants appeal.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiffs (respondents), the essential facts are:

Defendant Jotham Bixby Company was the owner of a subdivision known as Bixby Terrace. Defendant Deeble was a sales agent for such subdivision and defendant Smith was a duly authorized salesman under the direction of defendant Deeble. Plaintiff J. W. Wood accompanied by defendant Smith visited the Bixby Terrace subdivision and viewed certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Wainscott v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pohle v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Harris v. National Union of Marine Cooks & StewardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Christensen v. SlawterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API