Wood v. Jotham Bixby Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs after trial before the court without a jury in an action to rescind a contract of purchase of real property defendants appeal.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiffs (respondents), the essential facts are:
Defendant Jotham Bixby Company was the owner of a subdivision known as Bixby Terrace. Defendant Deeble was a sales agent for such subdivision and defendant Smith was a duly authorized salesman under the direction of defendant Deeble. Plaintiff J. W. Wood accompanied by defendant Smith visited the Bixby Terrace subdivision and viewed certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Wainscott v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Pohle v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Harris v. National Union of Marine Cooks & StewardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Christensen v. SlawterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.