Hines v. Brode
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George H. Moore, and Charles M. Ackerman, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
By his action plaintiff sought damages for the deceit practiced upon him by defendant in the matter of an executory contract for the sale of land. The gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint is as follows: He was induced to. buy forty acres of land in an arid district of Los Angeles County, upon representation by defendant vendor that there was appurtenant to this land water and a water-right sufficient to raise by irrigation all ordinary crops. A written contract was entered into between the parties which fixed the purchase price of this forty acres of land at two thousand dollars, plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Whitney v. . AllaireNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Williams v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Selman v. ShirleyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Murphy Oil Co. v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.