Legal Opinion
McClory v. Dodge
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 26, 1931No. Docket No. 4243PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.
Plaintiff and respondent N. E. McClory brought this action to recover the value of certain shares of stock which he claims had been secured from him under an illegal contract and by fraudulent representations.
The case was tried before the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against all of the defendants. Prom this judgment the defendants Dodge, Harrison, Welch, Hunter and Griffis have appealed. Hool and Boyd did not appear at the trial and judgment was entered against them by default and they have not appealed.
The facts necessary for a correct…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Wassermann v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Castle v. Acme Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Frontier Milling & Elevator Co. v. Roy White Co-operative Mercantile Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- PMC, Inc. v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. CatinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- L & E Co. v. U.S.A. Ex Rel. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Cal-Apex, Inc. v. U.S.A. Ex Rel. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Preston-Thomas Construction, Inc. v. Central Leasing Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.