Caudill v. Caudill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
CORN, Vice Chief Justice.
Eula May Caudill brought this action against Oscar Caudill for damage by reason of personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident. The plaintiff is the sister-in-law of the defendant, the owner of the car.
The driver of the car is the son of the defendant. It was alleged and proof was adduced that the driver was on a mission in behalf of the defendant at the time of the accident. The defendant’s testimony was directed solely to the physical condition of the plaintiff as affected by the accident. His only witness was a doctor.
Medical evidence was in conflict. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Gates v. Settlers' Milling, Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Harper v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nash v. HillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Burnett v. TisdellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Tickel v. FeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959